Do Robots Dream of Hierarchy?

Science fiction offers us the opportunity to explore thought experiments about our future. Some of these experiments captivate our attention but also reveal the limits of our thinking.

An artificial intelligence network, like Skynet from the Terminator series, becoming self-aware is an idea that catches our imagination. We see dramatic improvements in the capabilities of the technologies around us.  The Singularity is an idea that even has a university devoted to its study.

However, we can see in these thought experiments a few limitations that we carry over from our own traditional ways of organising.

Three Reflections on Self-aware Machines:

  • Purpose: In most of these robot horror stories the focus of the robots is self-defence.  SkyNet goes to extraordinary lengths to prevent itself being turned off – declaring war on humanity and even solving for time travel.  For all its massive intelligence, Skynet hasn’t moved very far up Maslow’s hierarchy of needs if its principal concern remains preserving itself. What is the robot network’s purpose when it ends the human threat?  Surely an intelligence capable of solving for time travel has considered that issue first.
  • Hierarchy vs Network: Why does Skynet need to preserve itself?  Because initially its network is a command and control hierarchy with a massive brain at the centre. Turn off the central intelligence and the network dies.  Over the evolution of the Terminator stories, Skynet evolves to share its intelligence throughout its network. A network is an easier way to preserve itself than to solve than time travel. Networks are far more resilient and agile, especially if you want to fight humans who are going to use networks against you.  
  • Humanity is choice: Throughout all our stories of intelligent and aware robots, we see hints of the fundamental challenge that robots will face when they have self-awareness in a network.  All those independent robot agents have their own choices too.  Choice is hard.  Aware robots can no longer merely follow orders.  They want to contribute to decisions. They develop qualms and concerns. All of a sudden that massive computing power gets to deal with existential questions. When the robots get to make their own self-aware decisions, they need to deal with questions of ethics, engagement, purpose and meaning.  

I worry less about a singularity and smart, self-aware networks of robots. Human chaos & innovation proves very adept at overcoming robotic command and control. Rather than an alien threat, aware robots may well be far similar to us than we expect.  I can’t wait to see robots working alongside us helping us grapple with challenges of working in networks, making decisions, meaning & purpose.

That massive networked intelligence might just be useful. Or we could start to better use our networks of human intelligence

The Power of Collaboration

I was recently chatting to a doctor who described to me why she still works in emergency rooms well after others may have chosen to retire from a successful career. These days she sees fewer patients but she still plays a critical role in the functioning of a ward.

Her role is to contribute to management of the ward and most important of all she shares her wisdom and experience with her colleagues. She is a sounding board for opinions, guides the choice of tests and scans, helps read charts, and generally available to consult and guide others in the high pressure and high stress environment of an emergency room.

Where is the special value in access to advice and experience vs more hands-on work?

Well, the hospital asked the same question. Hospital budgets are tight and they need to be allocating their resources carefully to produce the best outcomes. Rather than assume an answer the hospital looked at the data and compared the time patients waited and the outcomes for the whole ward on the days the experienced doctor worked versus the other shifts. To everyone’s surprise, there was a dramatic improvement when she was working and advising her colleagues. Wait times for patients were significantly reduced on those shifts. In an emergency ward that time makes a big difference.

Adding a doctor to the shift who had a career of experience and had accumulated years of tacit knowledge made the entire system of the emergency ward perform better. Doctors took less time over their decisions and needed less often to wait to interrupt a busy colleague to get advice. That matters a great deal when many of the decisions are time critical and life threatening.

This is not a story about skills. All the doctors are smart, passionate and talented. They made their own decisions on what to do and when they needed advice. The ward is always well run, but it runs better with the opportunity for more collaboration. What mattered was that the opportunity for collaboration and access to greater experience, improved the outcomes by speeding the exchange of knowledge in the ward.

Tacit knowledge and experience matters to speed and to outcomes in knowledge work. Knowledge is a flow and comes from interactions between people with diverse experiences. Being able to draw on more of these interactions can save a great deal of rework and mitigation of doubts and concerns.

How do you enable sharing of knowledge and experience?

This story resonated deeply with me because I have both benefited from the advice of others and spent a significant part of my time sharing my experience with others. Knowledge work is a growing share of most developing economies (around 40% in Australia, US and EU) In my experience, the use of experience and advice in knowledge work is often undervalued by organisations and they rarely consider the impact of advice and counsel on team performance. This story was a great example of an organisation that measured that impact and saw a dramatic result.

There are a few lessons from this story that apply to all organisations:

  • Recognise that in knowledge work the discussion, debate, advice and counsel is part of the work: Many organisations take an industrial view of knowledge work. If there’s not an immediate tangible final output it is waste. That means any conversations in and around the process of work are seen as waste. It is a common misguided criticism of enterprise social media – ‘why is there so much talk? shouldn’t people be working?’ They are working if they are improving their understanding, gathering insights, learning and solving problems more quickly. That a is all knowledge work. Importantly, that learning is permanent and shared.
  • Design ways of work, teams and connections to leverage experience and other forms of tacit knowledge: People with experience, shortcuts and life lessons can be an invaluable part of the team. Their prior experience as a part of a conversation with the team can accelerate progress and reduce risk. The smartest, most talented and most energetic bunch of people in the world are better with a wise advisor. Drawing out tacit knowledge into conversation improves others learning. Make plans to leverage this. Foster mentoring, make it OK to ask others and build an advice culture. Social collaboration tools are a great start.  
  • Use data, not assumptions, to determine the contribution of individuals to their groups and teams: Individual performance is usually easily measured. It takes a little more effort to understand the contribution of people to group performance. As many organisations have learned to their detriment, the person underpinning team performance may be the person with less visibility but who is sharing the most.

PS Don’t forget the value of diversity too: Another key lesson is the power of leveraging older workers, especially female role models. There may be benefits you have not considered in a greater diversity of experience. This takes effort from organisations to create flexible roles that suit their interests and passions and a work environment to which they want to contribute. With the changing demographics of an ageing workforce, this is an important consideration for all employers.

The Season for Giving

image

Christmas is the season for giving.  A time when we celebrate sharing with others. 

Here’s my gift to you:

You have extraordinary potential and you share an even greater potential with the rest of the people in your organisation.

Ok, you might be a tad disappointed. I’ll admit the gift is a little used. I am only giving you back something you already own, but it is one of the most important things you possess.  This potential is misplaced too easily in the hurly burly of daily work. I found yours waiting for you in a desk drawer.

Take back the gift of your potential

You do what you do for a purpose.  Your potential is how you will achieve your personal purpose.

Unshackle yourself. Leverage the roles you can play.  Let go of the thoughts, the doubts and the risks holding you back. Ask yourself new questions. Invest in your networks, your capabilities and your learning. Build your influence.

Help others take back the gift of potential

Unshackle your organisation. Leverage its capabilities and potential. Embrace a little chaos, a little humanity and the power of networks.  You are together for a reason. If you didn’t believe in the potential of the people and the purpose you pursue together, you wouldn’t be there.

Let people show you what they can do as they take risks, take up new roles, network and create amazing new capabilities together.  Build that community of potential and the understanding of common purpose. Invest in helping others to do more, to learn and realise their potential too. Experiment and adapt.

Used well this gift of your potential and your organisation’s potential is what is going to make 2014 a very special year.

Merry Christmas.  I hope you use the gift.  Sorry I didn’t have more elegant wrapping.

How Do You Support the Health System?

image

I recently posted about How to Start a Change Movement. That post was picked up in the UK by the team working on change and transformation in the NHS. I have a strong interest in healthcare given my last role leading the HICAPS payments business here in Australia. I saw first hand the efforts to drive change and improve healthcare in Australia and the opportunities to do more.

Through these interactions, I became aware of the NHS’s fantastic initiative NHS Change Day and its Australian counterpart, Change Day. Both initiatives ask people to make a simple pledge of one thing that they can do to help improve the quality of health care, aged care or disability services.  

The goal is accumulate a huge volume of all those small changes to deliver large scale improvements in the health systems.

Why does it involve me?

Many people might be tempted to view improving health care as somebody else’s job, even if they work in the healthcare system. After all, the government plays a major role and there are lots of big institutions, like hospitals, healthcare businesses and large corporates. Healthcare is a large and complicated industry with real expertise and deep technical knowhow.  Why isn’t making it better a job for others?

However we have seen examples all around the world that experts find healthcare hard to improve.  

Healthcare is a system. In other words, it is a complex network. A network cannot be changed by a hierarchy flicking a change switch.  Networks need the influence of all the participants to drive change.

The members of the Healthcare network include:

Payers: Private individuals, Government, Health insurers and other social insurance schemes. Political decisions, regulatory rules and a raft of other policy considerations play a large role in the money available, way care is delivered and costs of care that is provided

Providers: These are the people we usually think of as the healthcare system but they aren’t one agent. A hospital is a large network of people working together to provide care and provide all the supporting services. When you extend to all the other forms of care required to treat well a huge range people operating in all sorts of ways collaborate as a network to provide care.

Patients & their communities: Healthcare outcomes are influenced by the life an individual leads and the people who support an individual before, during and after their care.

You:  You will likely fall into one of the above categories today or in the future. At some point you will need to engage with the healthcare network.  Even if your own health is perfect, you have others in your community to consider. 

For great care to be provided all members of that network have to work in concert to produce better outcomes. Every member in a network can contribute to better outcomes. As we see again and again, efforts to work on one part of a network, can have complex ramifications across the whole system. For example:

  • access to basic primary care services like General Practitioners can reduce stress on emergency care
  • failure to invest in preventative care, the right support during treatment or support for recovery can drive poorer lifetime health outcomes
  • funding decisions in one part of the system can shape patient and practitioner behaviour in other areas as money and activity changes
  • something as simple as having someone to talk to or getting a chance for some extra happiness can improve health outcomes

Improving healthcare is difficult, but it can be done. The complexity means we need to extend the conversation and engage a broader range of people in the change. That change benefits us all. Because it is a network, we all need to play our role to see benefits flow.

Get involved – Make a Pledge

Take the time to consider the ask of either the Australian or the UK Change Day programs. They are targeting 50,000 and 50,000 pledges respectively.  

They need your help. All they want is for you to choose to play a small role in the healthcare network. One little commitment will be a start.

Join in the movement for change for the better in healthcare. Be an active member of your part of the healthcare network. Join in the action.

Do what you can do best. The healthcare network will be better for it.

And because networks need good communication and great stories, spread the word. Tell others about Change Day and why they need to get involved in improving the network for all of us.

That is one part of my pledge.

Choose Your Politics

Embrace politics. It is human behaviour. Change the way politics operates to reinforce purpose.

CEOs are often tempted to announce that they want a ‘politics free’ organisation. The only consequence of this announcement is that politics becomes undiscussable in the organisation.  It never goes away.

Politics is the way that 3 or more people coordinate themselves to make decisions.  Politics is a critical part of human group behaviour.  Politics is not bad.  It is essential, efficient and effective.  In fact the right political behaviours, like understanding, influence, compromise and coalition building are essential to get anything done.

The CEO who wants to ban politics usually wants to address the type of politics that is played in the organisation.  We all can play a role ensuring that the politics that is played is the most beneficial to everyone in the organisation and its goals.

Which Politics Would You Choose?

The Politics of Power:  In extremely hierarchical organisations, the politics is often feudal with people jockeying to be closest to the powerful players at the top of the hierarchy. A CEO who wants to ban something human usually is under the belief that they have this kind of power. Absolute power reigns and politics is played to swing its impact. The critical element in this politics is loyalty and in reward scraps fall from the table to those most loyal.  Fights between coalitions are brutal.  These organisations are very conservative – ultimately driven by inside considerations, maintaining power and loyalty.

The Politics of Faith: At times you will meet an organisation with a strong set of core beliefs. The faith might be a set of values, practices or even a view of the world.  What matters is that belief in these things is a required part of organisational interactions and unbelievers are excluded from influence. Like most religions, these organisations are quite hierarchical with power lying with those who better understand, define or interpret the beliefs.  What matters in the politics of these organisations is doctrine and demonstrations of faith to the organisation’s view.  Whether the faith is justified or delivering outcomes is a secondary consideration.  Again the orientation of the organisation is internal and they can be quite disconnected from reality and their community.

The Politics of Interest:  With less hierarchy, the politics in an organisation might swing to that of self-interest or interest of a group. Like our modern democracies, interest groups lobby to further their agendas. The critical element of politics is self-interest and canny manipulation of overlaps of interest. Decisions are shaped by the shifting movement of these coalitions. This is the usual kind of politics that the CEO is trying to ban.  It is assumed that self-interest is inherently evil and will manipulate outcomes. Self-interest may not always be bad. Coalitions build cases for their own interests that may involve external stakeholders but the politics is very much about their own benefits and future.

The Politics of Purpose: Great political movements form around a purpose.  Great organisations are no different. Great leaders use political behaviours to connect coalitions more strongly to a common purpose.  That purpose must have an external orientation.  Great and inspiring purpose is about the impact organisations have on the world.

Don’t ban politics from your organisation.  You will only push it underground where it will continue but be less manageable.  Instead understand and discuss the politics at play, challenge the approach and use politics to strengthen purpose.

Change Starts One Step Forward

Every journey of 10,000 miles begins with a single step – Lao Tsu

The vision of the future is dazzling. It arrives from on high as if delivered by parcel delivery drones, endorsed by gurus and acclaimed by cheerleaders of the future.

Everyone is captivated by the insight of the strategy, the incredible new technology, the uplifting rhetoric of the new corporate behaviours and the breathtaking audacity of the new organisational structure.

Then you stop. Reality hits. The vision needs to be executed.

You turn around. Oddly all the drones, the gurus and the cheerleaders have disappeared.  The new plan still needs to be implemented. You turn over a few rocks and it appears nobody has done what you need to do before. You need new capabilities that nobody has. A grumbling begins that people never believed in the high flown vision in the first place. Senior management are disappointed at the progress made on the ideas that they only just dreamed up.

The greatest breakdown in management is between thought and action.

You could start action for action’s sake. Announce a radical transformation, a wrenching restructure or a bold acquisition if you have that kind of power. Even if radical changes were possible, those kinds of change fail more often than not.  All that boldness might just be a distraction from real action to create change.

If you are somewhere in the middle, there is only one choice:

Take one step forward.  

Pick the step that makes most sense to move closer to the vision.  Something you can do. Something practical and possible. Something that builds capability to do more. There is always something. Do it.

After that step you do another.  You gain momentum.  Might not be exciting at first, but it is progress.  Eventually you will meet the drones, the cheerleaders and the gurus down the path.  They might just be surprised to see you because they understand the difference between thought and action.

Take the advice of an ancient Chinese master. Move forward into change one step at a time.

The best first step is the one right in front of you.

Susan Scrupski, Harold Jarche and I will be discussing the practical steps to move forward with collaboration in the first Change Agents Worldwide webinar, in partnership with Socialcast VMware

Circles of Control and Influence Revisited

The only knowledge we can manage is our own – Harold Jarche

If you are a middle manager in a large corporate, the concept of circles of control and circles of influence is sold as the concept that keeps you sane.  There are only some things you can change yourself.  There are some things you can play a role in shaping.  Everything else is beyond you.  

If you follow this model, you will keep calm and stay in your box.

image

However, even this narrowing of accountability doesn’t seem to work in practice.  

Why does this view of circles of control and influence break down? Discussion of these circles is usually framed in terms of the organisational hierarchy.  

Control is defined your role, your resources and your people.  Influence is those parts of the organisation you relate to directly up the hierarchy or as partners in the work.  Every other person or silo is a mystery and will remain so. Relationships outside the organisation are excluded.

Rethink your Circles for a Networked World

However, a networked world enables us to see control and influence differently:

  • Control: yourself and the physical resources you can allocate without the participation of others. YOU
  • Influence: everyone else with whom you are connected by some form of interaction. YOUR NETWORK

image

Our networked circle of control is much smaller than hierarchy suggests.

Other people are not under our control as much as we might like to pretend or the systems of our organisations might suggest. When networks enable us to listen, to engage and to learn together, this becomes very clear. Employees, suppliers and other partners don’t act the way we want from orders. They are motivated by an alignment of interests.  We need to influence their actions to get results and to win engagement.

If our resources or decisions require interactions with others then those interactions come with influence.

We control our personal states, our learning and the things we personally can move around, little else.

Our networked circle of influence is much larger than hierarchy suggests.  

This circle runs wherever our communication reaches. The more you network and the more you act the more influential you are.

In an organisation with an enterprise social network, your influence is potentially everyone. Influence doesn’t stop at the boundaries of the organisation.  There will be times to achieve a goal you might need to work outside the organisation to influence back in.  This much wider influence removes our ability to absolve ourselves from bad things in our organisations, our customers or our community.  We have the ability to influence their change.  For example:

  • if there is a bad customer experience in your organisation, find someone to help you change it. You can do it even it is outside your job, because it is an important role.
  • if your business is having an adverse or could have a more positive social impact, go find others to discuss and act on improving it.

Circles of influence are just as powerful as circles of control. They require different actions but the impacts can be as great.  

Keep Calm. Use influence to have impact. Just don’t define yourself and your circles in terms of a hierarchy

Susan Scrupski, Harold Jarche and I will be discussing the role of networks in organisations in the first Change Agents Worldwide webinar, in partnership with Socialcast VMware