
One of the greatest dangers of the age of artificial intelligence is that it may unintentionally exacerbate one of the worst sins of modern customer experiences – disempowered people. Never put people in front of a customer without the power to help. If you see a problem or ask for feedback, let people address it immediately. We can’t let bad processes or AI downgrade our people’s skills or empowerment in favour of remote and distant online processes that are not accountable to customers.
This post begins in a rant. My dishwasher died. I ordered a new one to be delivered and installed a global white goods manafacturer. On the day of delivery their team member said ‘The inlet is too close to the wall. It’s a known problem. Happens a lot. I can’t install today. You need a plumber to fix that first.’
Insight 1: If a problem is common enough to get this reaction then either enable your team to solve it or warn the customer to prepare for it. Dont just leave it be. Also it would be helpful if you had information online for the customer and their plumber to understand the specifications required.
Anyway, a plumber implemented a fix. As per the email confirming the cancellation of the delivery, I rang the call centre to rebook delivery. In this fifteenth minute call to an offshore call centre, I was transferred once and twice put on hold. Ultimately, I was told I couldn’t book, but they would send an email to another team to trigger a booking process by email over the next 48 hours. I assume this is to have the efficiency of online booking and automated workflows, but having worked with two of their people for fifteen minutes already, it is a false efficiency for them and useless for me. The first agent should have been able to solve my job in less than two minutes.
Insight 2: If you ask a customer to take a step make sure the team has the ability to solve the issue. I really felt for the agents who worked hard to make the call a great experience, but couldn’t do anything which made it a waste of all of our time. Also why does issuing a trigger email take 48 hours in this age? This is a failure of systems, not people.
At the end of my call, I was transferred to a customer satisfaction survey. In anger, I hung up. I was immediately texted a customer satisfaction survey. I told them to fix their processes and empower their people. Then I started writing this post.
Insight 3: If you ask a customer for feedback, pay attention to the answer and empower your people to address the feedback raised. The numbers are meaningless when you could be improving the process and aren’t. Asking for feedback that you ignore makes matters worse.
Whatever this organisation thinks its processes are, they aren’t paying attention to impact of their processes. They have also not given the people in the system the power they need to solve issues or prevent recurring problems.
People want their work to be productive. Give them the capabilities to solve the issues that come up and especially any that you direct customers to call them about. Look at processes end-to-end and push the opportunity to resolve issue as far to the front of the process as possible.
Use the powers of AI to identify these issues that recur and flag them for resolution. Use AI to enable people to work across silos and processes to get customer’s needs met quickly. Don’t put humans in the loop without giving them the power to override the systems or the process.
Somewhere in a distant headquarters, an executive is wondering why customer satisfaction is so poor given the great product quality and all the work on automation. The answer is clear to their own teams. They need empowerment.
Insight 4: If you aren’t going to use the data you have, then at least talk to your teams in the process. Ask them. They know what’s wrong and needs fixing. It might be a good idea to let them fix it. Also it’s useful once in a while to follow some of the instructions you give customers and test that they work.
My experience could have been avoided or improved in multiple ways and by any person involved in the process. Instead I wait for time to elapse to begin a digital booking process with a real risk I need to go through this all over again. We need individuals in the process and those overseeeing the system of processes empowered to change the system to make it better.
Postscript: The email issued the same afternoon. At first the link failed security testing on a work computer. When I got through on my phone, it asked for a customer number that was nowhere in the order. When I searched up my order, I was told I had to call to book my order. I called with some reluctance. Again I completed the IVE yet had to be transferred to another team. This time the agent booked my delivery right away. She couldn’t explain why the previous agent had not been able to do it or why I couldn’t book online.
Last Insight: The online booking process is clearly flawed from its security to its effectiveness. Variation in agent skills is impacting the experience. These are issues that need to be fixed.











A relatively direct relationship between product and market might work for some simple product solutions, particularly those involved in offering a new product direct to consumers. However, lean start-up has reminded us that success takes loops of learning and iteration to find that match between product and market.

