Seek out criticism

An absence of criticism is not a good sign.  Seek out the feedback that you are missing.

If you are not receiving regular criticism, then you may be missing out on valuable feedback.  For a leader or an organisation, a lack of feedback usually means one of three things needs to be checked:

  • Listening to the right people:  Talking to fans and supporters is usually easy.  They approach you and are eager to share their praise.  You may need to seek out critics and the disaffected.  Broaden your conversations and start asking for feedback.  Look at the margins and look for information that is being discarded because it is incomplete, inconsistent or inconvenient.
  • Encouraging feedback: We all recognise the signs of a leader or an organisation that asks for feedback but doesn’t want any criticism.  It can be a simple as praise being recorded by you but all complaints must be put in writing by the other person. People know how to respond with caution when they see those signals.  Make sure that your behaviours, systems and processes encourage and celebrate negative feedback as a learning process.  Show how you have responded positively to negative feedback and made changes.  Otherwise negative feedback will be actively concealed or actively discouraged.
  • Stop pleasing everyone:  You can’t satisfy everyone.  People are dissatisfied with every change and every business. Everyone expect you to have a specific & unique point of view.  There is a real danger that you don’t stand for anything, that you might not be taking enough risks, that you aren’t targeted enough and that you are sitting in the safe middle ground.  Hearing the right criticism is an important sign that you are achieving your specific plan.  Being generally good won’t get you where you want to go. 

Voice is a critical component to guide our actions.  We all need to encourage as much positive and negative feedback as we can.

Your change is unique

With the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington and Martin Luther King Jr’s “I have a dream speech” this is a week in which we are reminded of the power of people’s dreams to change the world and the power of individuals to bring those dreams to life.

How do you want to change the world?  

Everyone does, at least in some small way. Everyone’s desired change is slightly different.

That is the work each of us need to do.  The diversity of our unique visions is also the reason why the changes are not going to happen on their own.

Here is an exercise to try:  Take the next five people you meet and ask them to describe specifically how they would like to change the world.  Don’t settle for “achieve world peace” or “end poverty” or “achieve gender equity”.  Ask them to explain how that world would look, work and feel in some specific detail.  

The answers are diverse even if the themes are consistent.  Ask yourself how you would describe similar changes. My experience is that each person’s method and inspirations for changing the world are driven by unique visions and their experiences.

This drives us to at least five insights for our personal actions to realise our changes in the world:

  • You can’t leave it to others: Nobody else wants exactly what you want.  Don’t you want your views to be considered and some part of your vision realised.  If you are not involved you don’t get to shape the changes and the decisions will be made by others.  As many people have discovered specifying requirements and sitting back generates a different quality of outcome to being a part of a change process.
  • You can’t do it alone: Any change to the world, as opposed to ourselves, by definition affects others.  You will need to take their goals, concerns and circumstances into account.  You will need their help or at least an end to resistance.  Plan for a collaborative and adaptive process to engage them in the change.  There is always enough work to do and ideas turn into better action through discussion and debate.
  • We need to use what is common: Finding common purpose, concerns and circumstances is how we engage others to move to new actions.  We need to align around each of these before we can move forward in an engaged way.   Differences are issues to be addresses.  What is common is our way forward together.
  • We need to embrace difference: Don’t sweep difference however small aside or under the carpet.  It will only come back later more dangerously and more vehemently.  Explore how the small differences in vision can be addressed or aligned in action.  Difference is the source of ideas, innovation and growth.
  • Use the ‘fierce urgency of now’: The best time to act is when you see the need for action. When you see a need for action, act then.  Others will see it to and the common view of a need to act is important to leverage.   Later, you will need to recreate the same level of energy and urgency or you and others will be endlessly debating when is the right time.
If you want to make your changes in the world, you will have to act, embracing the challenges that it brings.

Leaders reach magic in people

The great leaders are like the best conductors – they reach beyond the notes to reach the magic in the players.” – Blaine Lee

As a board member of Melbourne Chamber Orchestra, I have had the opportunity over the last 5 years to witness the power of leadership in drawing out the magic of exceptional personal and team performance. In that time, I have learned a great deal about leadership from William Hennessy, MCO’s exceptional Artistic Director.

MCO performs works both conducted and unconducted.  A group from 8-30 performers is led either from a conductor’s podium or from within the orchestra.  However the group is led, you see five elements demonstrated by the leaders in the best performances:

Passion:  A great leader brings passion for the work, the players and for the performance.  That energy is infectious inspiring the players and will be conveyed to the audience.  This passion is inspired by a sense of creative purpose and a will to create excellence.

Preparation: Preparation runs from design of the program years in advance through rehearsals to the minutes before performance.  Quality of preparation for performance is key to the results of the group.  An audience only gets one chance to hear a great performance. Every thing must be done beforehand to maximise that outcome.   

Attention:  Great performances just don’t happen.  They are shaped by a meticulous attention to the detail.  No leader goes through the motions or relies on their big picture view of the desired result.  Leadership of an orchestra cannot be outsourced.  As lean organisations where everyone must pull their weight, the leader of an orchestra must pay attention to every aspect of performance to lead a great result.  Their eyes and ears are constantly alert to the detail of the work and to their next intervention.

Communication: A leader does not need words to communicate.  A tempo & level of performance can be set by role modelling.  Coaching can be made with a glance or movements of the body.  However delivered, the communication is continuous and two-way.  Leaders receive feedback from the players in the same way and use that to shape the group together in a great performance.  The leader is looking to ensure that the whole orchestra remain together at the peak of performance in the work.  

Effort: Leadership of an orchestra is not a passive endeavour.  It is physically and mentally demanding work.  Beginning well before performance in planning and rehearsal this effort continues through until after the audience has left the hall.   You don’t lead an orchestra through hierarchical position.  You lead through sustained physical engagement with the players and music.  It is not uncommon to see a musician using every spare moment to practice for a piece.  The same applies to their leaders.  

All leaders can learn from other domains.  Come see MCO perform and be surprised by the magic of leadership in another domain.

The few & the many

Large corporations are challenged sustaining & retaining change agents.  A handful of change agents can make an enormous difference to any organisation.  Change agents are at the heart of the ability to innovate, to adapt and to remain externally focused.  Change agents are often the gateway for new partners, explore the edges and conduit for new ideas into organisations because of their willingness to consider the new, to experiment and to get stuff done.

The ideal model is that leaders everywhere have the capability and the authority to drive change.  Like many ideal models, this oft stated ambition is harder to find in practice.  This difficulty is no excuse for not trying.  However, many corporates deliberately, or unwittingly, adopt a 21st century demarcation between traditional managers who keep the wheels of business as usual turning and their contingent of change agents who transform the business.

The best outcome for corporates is to have a spread of change agents across their business.  That way each function and division can be exposed to change.  For major initiatives, change agents from different silos can collaborate to bring the business together in key initiatives.  Sadly, this model is often the most dangerous for the change agents.  Change agents must operate in the midst of large groups of more traditionally oriented managers, dependent on a tolerance for diversity and ongoing support for their efforts and occasional failures. As one change agent put it to me, this model means that they have to deliver 110% of the contribution of a traditional manager in the organisation & then deliver change just to make their position safe.  The slightest slip creates an opportunity for backlash.

Commonly change agents will exist in clusters drawn to other similar individuals who are interested in new ideas and making change happen.  Some change agents explicitly recruit and develop teams who support their change agenda.  While this model can provide a safe haven to nurture change and change leaders, it creates a risk that the entire cluster can be lost at once with a change of leadership or a mass defection. Increasing fragility is not a sustainable solution.

So what can be done to foster the growth of change agents across an organisation?  Here are 6 actions to help.

  • Know who they are, what they are working on and show interest.  Who are your ‘go to’ people if it is new, difficult or demanding?  A simple cup of coffee or a phone call can do wonders in retaining and encouraging people to push for change.  Clearly, if you run talent processes you can be more deliberate in investing in their development and careers.
  • Value project work as much as line management.  Change agents will be drawn to projects, but if it is a ghetto you will lose their impact in the rest of the business.
  • Encourage diversity of individuals, allow diverse management styles and make openness to the new & different a key value in your organisation.  Remember not all change agents are charismatic leaders and many will be far from traditional homes in edgy technology, creative or strategic business opportunities.  The effective styles are as diverse as human nature.  Some of the most effective individuals may be working in surprising parts of the organisation.
  • Network your change agents so that they do not feel isolated, can share lessons, can collaborate and even use their collective power.  Encourage change agents to share their skills and develop teams of others who can drive change. An enterprise social network will help if your culture allows it.  Also encourage your change agents to network externally and to learn from others.  
  • Ensure your performance management systems reward people for driving change and do not fatally punish a single setback.  Peer measurement and forced rank systems can exaggerate the impact of setbacks & can be vulnerable to politics if not well managed.  If you only value delivery of business as usual results in performance and find comparisons to change agents hard, your change agents will get the message quickly.
  • Foster a culture of working aloud & sharing of ideas.  Working aloud provides protection for change agents. More importantly, it enables the change agents to role model their behaviours to inspire others across the organisation to embrace & lead change.

A little investment in change agents goes a long way.  Too many organisations have missed their opportunity.  They are the ones left wondering why change is suddenly so hard.

Be prepared for social change

Our mental models of how things work are often a barrier to our adaptation to new capabilities.  Digital disruption will stretch our thinking in many new ways.

When railroads were first invented they were designed to be a powered form of wagon for bulk goods.  Only later did people develop the potential for railway travel, changes in communications and accelerate the distribution of fresh foods and other consumer goods. The introduction of railway travel created significant social change, demands for new resources and infrastructure, and ultimately innovation in business & society. After a start as a powered wagon, innovators changed the mental model of a railway developing its potential and its impact on society as a whole.

We are in the midst of digital mobile and social revolution that is so new and widereaching we can face the same challenges in adapting our mental models. Yesterday I attended the New Economy Conference in Melbourne. The audience and speakers who had chosen to attend the event were very aware of the digital & social transformations beginning to be realised.  

A key theme of the day was the impact of digital, mobile and social processes in creating dramatic improvements in connection and speed of information sharing.  This has major ramifications for markets and for corporations as they see their offerings atomised to services, boundaries becoming porous and competition expanding in speed and global reach.  Even consumers are getting into the act of being producers through collaborative consumption. These ideas resonated strongly because they connect directly with the short-term transactional focus of our industrial age mental models of production, markets and competition.  They involve the exploration of relatively simple changes to current models (who, where, what, volume or speed).

Harder for everyone to grasp are the changes to social systems which come with these new technologies and the need for new physical, legal and social infrastructure.  To run their cross-continental networks, railroads needed and inspired new social infrastructure.  An example was that railroads required society to adopt a precise concepts of time to manage their schedules.  Railroads determined the implementation of the continental United States four time zones and largely became the arbiter of time in the communities that they connected. 

There is already evidence that these broader social changes are being created. Work is shifting rapidly towards creative knowledge work in many parts of the world with new demands for leadership and organisation. The acceleration of social activism was discussed on the day and the consequences of eBay, the many task allocation and collaborative consumption organisations in changing natures of trust & work.  We also discussed the social infrastructure required to measure value creation and waste in a broader more human way than just dollars (and the odd bit of avoided carbon).  We need to innovate as hard in this social infrastructure as in that to support the transactions.

As much as we create new ways of transacting, we also need to create new forms of community to supply the social infrastructure to support the transactions.  We need to support the short term interaction with a social fabric that can supply a longer human relationship.  Just as the railroads need a precise sense of time, our new economy demands new precision in ideas like collaboration, work, trust, community and value. 

When we think of the future of digital disruption, we need to allow both for how it will change the mental models we use every day but also how it may demand of us entirely new models, such as new concepts of organisations, jobs, reputation, social relationships and new measures of success.   Success in the new digital era will take both adaptation to a new transactional environment but also adaptation of a new infrastructure of community, trust and long term relationships.  New models of leadership and new social innovations will be required to achieve both.

Don’t

One word of advice you hear far too often trying to drive change is “don’t…” Both friends and foes are full of advice on what not to do.

Everyone wants to set boundaries on the actions of change agents. Your opponents will want to set a boundary that is short of your goal or fundamentally frustrates your path forward. Your allies will set boundaries to shape your actions to their needs, to constrain the threat of change and make change seem safer.

A prohibition like “don’t” sounds like a solid boundary. It may not be. When you hear “don’t”, ask yourself these questions:

  • Ask why? Are you being told “You cannot”, “You should not” or “Your action is inconvenient”? Getting to the point of the speaker will enable you to shape your next step.
  • If “Don’t” means “You cannot”, what would happen if you try anyway? Many barriers have been overcome by an open mind, persistence and experimentation.
  • If “Don’t” means “You should not”, seek to understand who is affected and what values are at stake. Too often the speaker is unclear. If so, clarify the issues with those affected. It may well be that others don’t share the speaker’s view or would be willing to compromise to see other values & outcomes achieved
  • If “Don’t” means “Your action is inconvenient”, acknowledge the inconvenience, mitigate where you can, but push on. Change inevitably includes some risk and inconvenience.
  • Most important of all, turn from the negative to the positive. Ask for advice on what you can and should do instead or in addition. Be open to new options, new ideas and include them in you consideration of new steps.

Helpful and unhelpful advice is everywhere for those driving change. Any advice including “don’t” needs careful scrutiny. It may not be either the advice or the obstacle that it purports to be.

Purpose & Practice grow together

Purpose beats entropy. Adaptive leadership practice renews.

Most learning experiences fade. Some fade very quickly. In general only a small proportion of any experience is retained. Even less makes it into sustained practice.

Almost seven years ago, I had my first experience of a learning program that introduced me to adaptive leadership. That amazing experience, the Accelerate Program at NAB, involved work inside and outside the organisation on complex issues.  These issues required the practice of the skills of a different type of leadership than traditional transactional and expertise based command and control leadership. That leadership experience has been one that has grown every day since.

What makes the power of adaptive leadership lessons grow in practice?

Purpose & practice.

Entropy is the normal process of decay in systems.  Negentropy, or syntropy, is its opposite where things grow in strength over time. My experience is that purpose is a great way to beat entropy.  The Wikipedia for negentropy notes that even scientists see power in purpose:

Indeed, negentropy has been used by biologists as the basis for purpose or direction in life, namely cooperative or moral instincts.

My first experience of adaptive leadership in the Accelerate Program forced a great deal of personal reflection on purpose. That clarity drove new action in a range of different domains. Purpose is an incredible force for energy and drives the desire to see these new skills in practice. Naturally I began tentatively and with a great deal of discomfort.

In all the years since, I have learned that continued Adaptive leadership practice refines the clarity of personal purpose. I have become more aware of my effect on others and on the importance of collaborative solutions that engage many people in the system. Those interactions reinforce the growing energy. The purpose sustains you through the challenges of practice. A continuous iteration of purpose and practice, grows the effectiveness of your leadership.

The purpose is in the work. Adaptive leadership work especially.

The Magic of Authority

Authority comes when we are ready to lead and ready to deliver for others

Recently I was talking with a colleague in a mentoring conversation.  This individual was describing her surprise that she was being asked to lead a piece of collaborative work that she had initiated.  A group that she had brought together were deferring to her authority.  Because she had convened the group, chosen the individuals and had the compelling vision for the work, the group were ready to follow.  It was an adjustment for someone who saw themselves as simply as the coordinator to realise that they had earned the authority to lead others more senior.

At the heart of this moment, is a key insight.  The magic of authority is this – you have the authority because others judge you ready.  Others chose to follow because they trust in your vision, insight, capabilities, experience or approach.  Their trust and their followership means that you are ready to lead, whether you know that yet or not.

You can be thrust into a rank you are unfit to hold or where you are unsuitable to deliver on the expectations of the position.  We have all experienced the terror of those first moments of a new and challenging role. Rank is a gift and some times it is bestowed in error.

Authority doesn’t work that way.  Unlike rank, it doesn’t come as a gift from others.  Authority is earned.  If you have authority, you are ready to exercise it.

So next time you are wondering how you ended up in charge, remember that you earned it.  Go show your new followers that their instincts are right.  

That leadership is the least that they expect from you.