Fascinating paper on the thought processes of entrepreneurs and other change agents:
– Personal Exceptionalism
– Dichotomous Thingking
– Correct Overgeneralization
– Blank Canvas Thinking
– Schumpeterianism
Chair and Non-Executive Director, Advisor, and CEO helping healthcare, finance, and educational organisations drive growth, leverage technology innovation, and realise the strategic value of transformation
Fascinating paper on the thought processes of entrepreneurs and other change agents:
– Personal Exceptionalism
– Dichotomous Thingking
– Correct Overgeneralization
– Blank Canvas Thinking
– Schumpeterianism
My post on redundancies on the Relume: Challenger Spirit blog. In an age of increasing disruption, we need to reflect on the lessons of change and prepare ourselves for changes ahead.

Vanilla is the dried pod of a rare orchard and the second most expensive spice after saffron due to the huge amount of labour in its production. Vanilla is a truly rich, delicious and subtle spice. Despite its exotic origins, vanilla is a very popular flavour and scent. As a result, vanilla is our usual metaphor for things that are plain, common and ordinary.
I meet a lot of people and organisations who have the ‘vanilla problem’. They have truly exotic skills, unique capabilities and create great value, but they seek to present a common, plain, everyday front to the world. They invest a lot of labour in building their skills but don’t get noticed. These individuals are competing so hard to fit in and to be like others that they miss the opportunities to stand for something unique.
It can feel safer to take the advice and run with the pack. However, when you don’t take advantage of your rich difference, you don’t get noticed. You can’t share the other great things that make you uniquely valuable and opportunities are lost. We don’t love vanilla because it is popular and common. We love vanilla because it is rich and exotic.
The best way to solve the ‘vanilla problem’ is to start living your unique purpose. Make a dent in the universe. Connect with others who share your point of view. Celebrate the difference of others. Collaborate with them to realise your goals. Do. Do again.
You can’t tell people that you aren’t vanilla. There’s far too much talk in this world for that to cut through the chatter. You can only show people your difference. Let them feel it.
Celebrate your rich and unique talents in the best way possible. Use them boldy. Use them in pursuit of your purpose.
Networked disruption often involves exponential change. One of the reasons traditional organisations are challenged by the threat of networked disruption is that they tend to struggle to interpret small changes in their markets.
Exponential change can see small changes blow out to large scale change while organisations are still trying to determine whether to react. This effect is multiplied if the organisation experiences a lot of volatility in its performance. The impacts of small disruptive competitors might get lost in other movements.
Often small changes are lost because many companies do not have a complete view of the growth of the industry. The effect is most dangerous for an organisation that may not even factor new disruptive services into its industry definition. These organisation can be quite satisfied with their growth and fail to see the initial market share loss to a small disruptive competitor
Coming from nowhere
If a smaller competitor, grows exponentially it can quickly explode. Let’s consider the example of a new disruptive competitor that is doubling customer growth every quarter. The new competitor might hit the large companies radar when it finally hits 1% of market share. The next quarter it is at 2%. These numbers might well be able to be explained away as short-term effects or an appropriate outcome for a niche. At 4%, management of the traditional organisation might begin to feel impacts and need to explain the change in the market. However by now they only have 90 days to respond before the disruptive competitor is at 8% and 180 days to 16%. There are not many organisations or industries that can afford to cede 8%-16% market share to a new competitor having to go through the distracting processes of cutting costs or dealing with capacity in their system.
Facing disruptive competitors growing exponentially through network effects too many organisations wait to respond until they have to respond. As we have seen in the music industry, photography and newspapers that is often far too late.
The situation is complicated further if the new business model fundamentally changes industry economics. These changes or market share losses may impact cashflow and might bring on issues in financing the business. Adjusting business models and financing under the pressure of disruption can take far longer in a mature business, particularly if the path forward is uncertain.
Beware of small signals
To guard against exponential change from networked competitors, organisations need to adopt a few strategies:
Culture eats strategy for breakfast – Peter Drucker
Enterprise social networks are a new form of communication in organisations. Culture is the outcome of how we interact. New interactions will change the culture of our organisations over time. Managing culture changes is critical for organisations coping with disruption.
Adam Pisoni recently quoted a comment I made at Disrupt.Sydney that enterprise social networks are ‘infrastructure of culture’. The comment was building on Kai Riemer’s talk at Disrupt.Sydney that technology that acts as infrastructure (of connection, of transportation or of communication) is open to novel uses and depends on users to make new sense of the infrastructure. Kai was drawing a distinction with our traditional tool based view of technology where it exists for a specific purpose. This point highlights one reason why we often have an inability to forecast where new communication technologies lead us in terms of changes in interactions and societal change.
Enterprise Social Networking is an Infrastructure for Culture
The culture of an organisations is a sum of the interactions across the organisation. It is the ‘way we do things around here’ or ‘what happens when the CEO is out of the room’. Culture runs deep and is the outcome of thousands of interactions. Speeches, posters and announcements don’t determine culture. As social animals, people look for guides as to what is acceptable in the stories of the organisation, the daily behaviours of others as they interact and importantly in how moments of crisis or conflict in the community are resolved. What happens when things get uncertain is at the core of the culture of a company.
Disruptive change tests the culture of organisations. Shaped by purpose and values as demonstrated in action, culture has an enormous influence on how the organisation runs and what is possible. Many organisations need new strategies to respond to disruption. However, if your strategy runs counter to your culture you will face challenges and likely fail. In the face of disruption, many organisations have found they simply cannot pivot their strategy because it threatens some deep elements of their culture.
A common goal of launching an enterprise social network to execute a strategy to ‘change culture’. Looking for more leadership, authenticity, accountability, openness or innovation, organisations assume that the network is a tool to deliver that outcome. These organisations are usually disappointed initially. Culture changes the strategy. All they see at first in the community on their network is their organisation’s current culture, just much more visible than ever before. The good, the bad and the ugly is on display. Even worse, the much vaunted new values from the strategy are often not on display because the community is not yet comfortable with those novel interactions, is waiting for a lead from others or does not accept that they can be arbitrarily imposed from above.
Communication networks are infrastructure, not tools. The change in culture is in the community adopting new behaviours, not the technology. The potential of enterprise social networks to change the culture of organisations occurs over time as the interactions change. Importantly, social networks offer opportunities to accelerate this change.
How do new interactions accelerate change the culture of the organisation?
Communities change culture when they adopt new interactions through the role modelling of others and the support of leaders. Enterprise social networking is an infrastructure to accelerate this process through new interactions and innovation. Disruption often demands rapid changes to organisation’s cultures that have been built up over many, if not hundreds of years. Networking the community within the organisation is critical to enabling the organisation to manage that change.

One individual & the organisation
Thanks anti-panel members for an interesting and valuable discussion. #disruptsyd
— Alex Ford (@alexkford) September 5, 2013
The traditional panel has real limits. Experiments are required for new formats to address disruptive, adaptive and emergent issues.
Yesterday at Disrupt.Sydney, Ben Gilchriest, Mani Thiru and I ran an experiment with an Anti-Panel.
Why hold an Anti-Panel?
The traditional panel format is broken when the questions being considered are adaptive, complex or emergent. A traditional panel can be:
How do you hold an Anti-Panel?
The first change is to make the anti-panellists servants of the conversation. Instead of an audience, there is a room full of participants working together. The role of anti-panellists is to facilitate the participants to discuss the issues.
Then you need to open up the format. We used a structure which ran from the personal to the group, explored a number of contributions (visual, emotional, allowed for movement in the room, etc) and iterated the discussion across:
I suspect each anti-panel would need to be different to be tailored to its participants, time allowance and topic, so I have deliberately left out further details of time allocation, questions, etc. We found ours changed as we learned what the participants needed. We would have liked to have included more leverage of digital capture and sharing in the discussion. That remains an opportunity for a future anti-panel.
The anti-panellists played a role as participants in discussion, timekeepers, facilitators through open questioning to draw in additional views and tried to keep a perspective of the whole conversation. Adaptive leadership questions that explore purposes, concerns, circumstances and that drew reflection on elements of the system proved valuable.
At Disrupt.Sydney, this format worked very well for the discussion on the topics of disruption. The participant feedback was very positive. We drew a rich range of perspectives from the participants, allowed the participants to shape the discussion and presented many opportunities to build, draw connections or add other elements to the topic of discussion.
More Experimentation Required
Our experience was a worthwhile first experiment. More will be learned as others leverage a fundamentally different approach to sharing the expertise of a room full of talented people with the passion to engage in a topic.
Let us know what you change and what you learn from your anti-panel. Post your experiences in the comments. Open experimentation, collaboration and iteration can only improve the results.
Credit: Credit for the idea of the anti-panel belongs with Matt Moore who helped us plan the session and was sadly unable to join us in bringing it to life.
Manifestos are the narratives that pull the future towards us as we lean into the unknown – Eddie Harran (@eddieharran)
The hardest part of disruption is disrupting yourself – R Ray Wang.
As the Industrial revolution changed society and new communication technologies were born, the western world experienced an age of revolution. Manifestos flew from the printers as advocates for changes in society sought to draw people to their causes and changes to society and economic activity. The passion for manifestos quietened after the shocks of two world wars. By then massive change had occurred to the level of social support, to the structure of the economy and to the power of social classes. Society had adjusted to new social models that mitigated (or in the case of totalitarian states suppressed) issues of the prior disruptions, our corporate business models were relatively static and a long boom drove western and global economies.
A new age of manifestos
We could be entering a new age of manifestos. With new communication technologies, disruption to traditional corporate models and the economic activity, change is required but we are not yet clear on what that change means. In recent weeks we have seen
The new manifesto is personal
If we learn one thing from that last age of manifestos, it should be that nobody should surrender themselves unthinking to a cause. The quote above captures the challenge of this new adaptive age. We need to disrupt ourselves as much as we need to disrupt the organisations, economies and societies we make up.
So what is your manifesto? Your changes are unique. You have a unique purpose. The changes you will drive will need to be social but before you join a movement be clear on what you want to see done. Make sure you are shaping the movement to your causes.
Take some time to reflect but start to write down your own personal manifesto. Feel free to beg, borrow and steal. Practice your new manifesto. Live your new disrupted self.
Adapt and change your manifesto as you learn from the work. Adaptation is not just a challenge for organisations it is a personal challenge. Will you have the capabilities required for the future of work? Will your role and your passions survive the changes ahead? You won’t know unless you adapt, experiment and change yourself.
The more you live your manifesto the clearer it will be, the more power it will have and the better guide it will be for others.
Start today. Others are waiting to see your contribution to the new age of manifestos.
I am very honored to be ranked as an influencer and quoted in the manifesto by the Responsive Organization movement. Excited to see so much enthusiasm for making organizations more innovative, more agile, more connected, more focused on customers and community and ultimately more human.
Success of these changes will depend on building new cultures, new capabilities and new leadership.